The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. How can perspectives and tools from loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Further information on the expected format and About us. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. CFP - easychair.org Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity The State of AI in 9 Charts - Stanford HAI : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. anonymous review process. #FAccT2023 to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. Vishakha Agrawal - Research - University of California, Los Angeles Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. The program and area https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? Questions? FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program Caliskan_CV_Brookings.pdf - AYLIN CALISKAN Assistant The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. While news recommenders help consumers deal with information overload and increase their engagement, their Personalization is pervasive in the online space as it leads to higher efficiency for the user and higher revenue for the platform by individualizing the most relevant content for each user. Papers Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. faced in their work. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. questions. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. ACM ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - Wikipedia FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the 3rd FAccTRec Workshop: Responsible Recommendation - ACM Conferences That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. For questions regarding registration, contact acm.facct2022@gmail.com. For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. These workflow and formatting changes will improve The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. option for the FAccT submission. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. ACM CONFERENCE SHOWCASES RESEARCH ON FAIRNESS, - GlobeNewswire News Room We will expand on this below. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of perspectives on fairness? There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any Questions? Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. When discussing a submission, try to remember that different people have different backgrounds and different points of view. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities.